Now the truth of this history will appear by considering the arguments on both sides. III. The arguments alleged for the testimony of the Three in. A Historical Account Of Two Notable Corruptions Of Scripture: In A Letter To A Friend [Isaac Newton] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. An Historical Account Of Two Notable Corruptions Of Scripture: In A Letter To A Friend [Sir Isaac Newton] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
|Published (Last):||5 May 2006|
|PDF File Size:||17.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Whence Erasmus said of him, that he was in affirming things, ” frequently violent and impudent, oc often contrary to himself1. For how can it properly be said that God was justified in the spirit? So then the testimony of Cyprian respects the eighth, or at least is as applicable to that verse as to the seventh, and therefore is of no force for proving the truth of the seventh: So then this interpretation seems to have been invented by the Montanists for giving countenance to their Trinity.
In those ages S. Lucas Brugensis describes to be an ancient, accurate, hitsorical, and industrious collator of manuscripts, found it wanting in all those he met with.
In Thomas Aikenheadan eighteen-year-old student charged with denying the Trinity, was hanged at EdinburghScotland. And that the very same reading was also in the manuscripts of the first ages may be gathered from the con formity of this reading to all the ancient Versions.
Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture (part 2: ff. ) (Normalized Version)
Switching to the diplomatic view of this text will show 13 deletions, reveal 10 additions and not apply 3 editorial regularizations. For they, in all their discourses to prove accoynt Deity of the Son, never allege this text, that I can find, as they would all have done, and some of them frequently, had they read ” God manifested in corruptiosn flesh;” and therefore they read o.
Legimus et nos in nonnullis Roberti Stephani codicibus. For they all eat their hands and arms. An quod libro findendam non sit?
Since the discourses of corruption late writers have raised in you a curiosity, of knowing the truth of that text of Scripture concerning the testimony of the three in heaven 1 Iohn 5. Which is manifest by the Prologue of S. Quid enim apostolns ait 1 ‘ Et manifeste magnum est pietatis sacramentum, quod manifes- 1 Libro septimo, cap. But to put the question out of dispute, there are footsteps of the insertion still remaining. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Nktable is also interesting to note that he felt he had to hide this fact because of fear for his life.
In reconciling this difficulty, I consider therefore that the only words of the text quoted, by Cy prian in both places are, And these three are one ; which words may be long to the eighth verse as well as ot the seventh. This MS is about years old.
The Greek manuscripts have the text thus: Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. In his defence he seems to say, that he corrected the vulgar Latin translation by the original Greek; and this is the great testimony the text relies upon. The churches, therefore, of those ages were absolute accoung to this reading.
Romae Bibliotheca, bona cum Leo- nis X. Many notable instances of this histroical has left us in cr mposing those very fabulous lives of Paul and Hilarion, not to mention what he has written upon other occasions.
East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Incomplete texts without a source. Sed hoc Joachim perverse trahere volens ad unitatem charitatis et consensus, inducebat consequentem auctoritatem. Non ita est ordo apud Graecos, qui integre sapiunt, fidemque rectam sectantur, epistolarum septem, quae canonicae nuncupantur, sicut in Latinis codicibus invenitur: One, noted is- contained the Apocalypse only.
So then the authority of the printed books rests only upon the authority of the editions of Erasmus and Cardinal Ximenes.
Scholiorum teste Photio MS. In another part of this treatise, lib.
An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture – Wikipedia
Vide etiam quse Erasmus contra Leum in hunc locum de Hieronymo fusius dixit. The two passages he considers are still not none by many to this day. For had the reading been dubious before he made it so, no man would have charged him with falsification for following either part.
I shall only mention the three follow ing varieties. Set up scripturd giveaway. In cseteris vero epistolis, quantum histoical nostra aliorum distet editio, lectoris judicio derelinquo. Quia apparuit in carne, justificatum est in spiritu.
Now to pull off the vizard, I cannot but, in the first place, extremely complain of Beza’s want of modesty and caution in expressing bistorical. Austin is one of those many; as you may see in his third book against Maximus, where he tells us, that “the Spirit is the Father, for God is a Spirit: And what is said of the testimony of Ter- tullian and Cyprian, may scriphure much more said of that in the feigned disputation of Athanasius with Arius at Nice.
For had it been in Cyprian’s Bible, the Latines of the next age, when all the world was engaged in disputing about the Trinity, and all arguments that could be thought of were diligently notablle out, and daily brought upon the stage, could never have been ignorant of a text, which in our age, now the dispute is over, is chiefly insisted upon.
But this is not the main designe, for so the annotation should have been set in corrruptions margin of the Latin Version. Will you now say that Ierome followed some Copy different from what the Greeks were acquainted with? A Man has been received up — preached in the world — angels saw Mm with us — truly this is mystery.
An ancient and diligent collator of manuscripts, cited by Lucas Brugensis by the name of Epanorthotes, notes in general, that it was wanting in the ancient Latin manuscripts. For Messala was scripturf anno Christithat is, six years before the banishment of Macedonius.
Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture (part 2: ff. 43-48)
But on the contrary, for disproving it, we have here the tes timonies of Facundus, S. I shall only mention the three following varieties. And yet I will not say but that it may be hereafter found in some Greek copies. For Hesy- chius1 cites the place thus: